The article's title may cause discomfort among innocent and gullible individuals who are not knowledgeable about the Torah's foundation. However, the cruelty towards those who mislead the people of Israel after the futility – brings mercy to the world.

Mendel Schneerson was very evil, and to this day, he is portrayed as a righteous man and a Messiah in the eyes of fools, that is, in the eyes of the multitude who are not knowledgeable about our Torah's foundations and do not know the words of the Sages Z”L, also known as the Sanhedrin: "Anyone who enjoys from Torah matters has taken his life from the world" (Chapters Of Fathers 4, 7), "Do not make them a crown for self-exaltation nor a spade with which to dig" (Ibid), furthermore they commended and said: "Love work and hate the rabbinate" (Ibid 1, 10), and "Torah which is not combined with work ends in nullity" (Ibid 2, 2) and the end of this person is to rob mankind (Kiddushin 29, 1).

Regarding his foolish Chassids who delved into Mendel's teachings, the Rambam says (Halachot of Repentance 3, 14–15):

"And those who have no part in the afterlife […] five who are called heretics: […] [5] And the one who worships a deity other than Him to be a mediator between him and the Lord of the Universe – each of these five is a heretic".

And Mendel's Chassids worship him (see here, it says: '119th birthday of King Messiah, our gift to the Rabbi') and believe that his spirit exists and active. Menachem Mendel himself would do so as well: Sending letters to the grave of his predecessor (see here), and in a clear way even recommended replacing the Lord with a flesh-and-blood god, as seen in "Holy Letters" (3, 266): "If one stands firmly in his attachment to him [=to the pretended Tzadik], without heeding the temptations of his urge[=he masks his heretical words with sanctimonious], and sends the question on the mark [=grave] of the honored holy teacher, my father-in-law our master, the Rebbe – will find a way to answer him".

And about the proper treatment towards the gullible people among Chabad Chassids who have been fed heretical hallucinations since babyhood, who neither delve into nor are knowledgeable about Chabad’s doctrine, and also do not mislead the people of Israel after the futility, you can learn in my friend's article A. Dahouh-Halevi's: "The definition of 'Captured Infant' according to the Rambam".

And about those innocent and gullible individuals, my friend writes at the beginning of his article "All the heretics immediately perish":

Many are the self-wise individuals who judge the heretics on a scale of merit: "They do not intend to foreign-worship", "They perform acts of loving-kindness", "There are many good qualities in them", "They are careful about observing the Mitzvot", and other similar delusions. However, all these self-wise individuals violate at least four clear commandments from the Torah!

Here are first two not-do-do Mitzvot: 1) To not teach merit for the one who incite to foreign-worship; 2) To not avoid from judging him negatively. Although the Torah says "inciter", it is clear that anyone who misleads the people of Israel into believing that the religion of the heretics is the religion of Moshe and the true religion we received at Sinai is an inciter and an instigator to foreign-worship. Furthermore, we have learned that heresy is graver than foreign-worship [paragraph 5 ibid], so that incitement to heresy is more serious than incitement to foreign-worship. Thus are the words of our rabbi in the Book of Mitzvot (Do-not-do, 20–21):

"And the twentieth commandment, the warning that the enticed person is warned against making a plea for the inciter [meaning to make arguments in his favor], and even if he knows of a merit [for the inciter] he is forbidden to mention it [=remind the inciter any matter that might stand in his favor], and he should not argue in his defense. as His saying, exalted: 'Do not have pity' [Deut. 13, 9], and transmitted in the interpretation: do not have pity – do not teach merit for him.

And the twenty-first Mitzvah, the warning that the enticed person is warned against remaining silent and not saying the guilt they know about the inciter, which would bring about the execution of the punishment upon him [meaning, from saying evidence that will lead to the killing of the inciter], as He, exalted, said: 'Do not cover for him' [the continuation of the verse in Deut. ibid], and transmitted in the interpretation: do not cover for him – if you know a guilt concerning him, you are not allowed to keep silent".

The two additional do-not-do Mitzvot that those self-wise transgress are: 1) To not love the inciter; 2) To not forsake hatred for him. Thus are the words of our Rabbi in the Book of Mitzvot (do-not-do, 17–18):

"The seventeenth Mitzvah, the warning that the enticed person is warned against loving the inciter or inclining toward him [=to listen to him and be persuaded by his arguments], as He, exalted, said: 'Do not consent to him' [Deut. 13, 9]. And from Sifrei, from the inclusion of the verse: 'Love the other as yourself' [Lev. 19, 18], can you love that? Talmud says: 'Do not consent to him' [Ibid].

The eighteenth Mitzvah, the warning that the enticed person is warned against lightening the grudge bearing [=easing the enmity and hatred] towards the inciter, one must bear a grudge firmly, and as long as one does not maintain vigilance over him, he transgresses a do not do Mitzvah, and He, exalted, said: 'Do not listen to him' [Deut. 13, 9], and mentioned in the interpretation: From the inclusion of the verse: 'Unload it with him' [Exo. 23, 5], can you unload that? Talmud says: 'Do not listen to him' [Ibid]".

Again we find, that it is forbidden under severe prohibition to make claims of merit to the heretics descendants that following their hearts recklessly. It is a great duty to condemn them and make claims against them, and even despise and humiliate them, disgrace and curse them. 'Do not consent to him, do not listen to him, nor your eye spare him, nor have pity on him, nor cover him' (Deut.  13, 9)"

Thus far A. Dahouh-Halevi’s words from his article.

The Harsh Judgment of Heretics in the Halacha

The cursed heretics harmed Israel very much during the days of the Second Temple's destruction. Therefore, there arose a significant need to add a request to the Amidah prayer. Consequently, Rabban Gamliel and his court added this blessing, setting it in the prayer as a plea before God to destroy the heretics.

It is important to mention that the severe Halachot stated regarding them are not relevant in our times, because we do not have a Sanhedrin that would fully support the enforcement of the Halacha. On the contrary, the religious world is now dominated by heretics and their descendants, and the governing institutions of the Israeli nation are based on the laws of the gentiles and Western culture. Thus, it is impossible in our times to fulfill the Halacha. However, the Halachot addressing heretics still hold immense importance to understand the severity of their actions, and to educate the public about the vast damage they inflict upon the nation of Israel, and to illuminate the path of Israel with truth and justice.

Let’s begin with Halachot of Foreign-Worship (10, 2):

"But the informers against Israel, heretics and Epicurus – it's a Mitzvah to destroy them by one's own hand and to hurl them into the pit of destruction because they strait Israel, and remove the people from following God as jeshua the Christian and his students [=Chabad perception is very similar to the ascetic Christianity that praises a god of flesh and blood and encourages worship of him even after his death]; Sadducees, Boethusians and their students [=All destroyers of the Oral Torah of various kinds, such as Chabad who go astray after the new Kabbalah] – evil's name decays.

And here is another Halacha from Halachot of Murderer and Preservation of Life (4, 10):

"The heretics, they are the foreign-worshipers from Israel [...] It is a Mitzvah to kill them. If one has the ability to kill them with a sword in public – kill. If not, one should act upon them with stories until causing their deaths. How? If someone saw one of them fall into a well and the ladder is there – one shall arrive early, remove the ladder and tell him: 'I am busy taking my son down from the roof and bringing it back'. And likewise in these matters".

That is to say, the Sages Z”L and our Rabbi allowed and even encouraged a person to be creative, and any way that a person thinks of to kill them is appropriate, because they destroy the true religion and the nation of Israel.

And let's include the words of our Rabbi in his interpretation on Hullin (1, 2):

And heretics, according to the Sages, are those Israelis who infidels [that is, they are foreign-worshipers and yet consider themselves part of Israel] [...] and they are people whose thinking has been clouded by stupidity, and whose souls have been darkened by desires [...]. This sect is the sect of jeshoa the Christian [...] and all who follow their path – 'evil's name decays' [Pro. 10:7].

That is to say, even though they cry out in their imagined love for every Jew, they have no right to place themselves in such a position, because they themselves are most abominable before God and are inferior than most educated secular Jews, because they distort and destroy the religion and desecrate the name of God with their disguises.

Eleven Reasons To Hate Chabad

1) They Are Vandals

These foolish Chassids are sticking and hanging images of their disgusting idol on public property all over the country and also within cities. According to the law, this incurs a fine of 750 NIS for a single poster. However, there is no one to fine because they are 'lone wolves', meaning there is no specific official body that can be charged or held accountable.

In the forum [of orharambam.com], I posted (in Hebrew) an explanation of how you can participate in removing the stickers – in the Mitzvah of eradicating foreign-worship.

2) Their Tefillin Are Invalid

In the article "The Mezuzah that went to Genizah" I proved that the commonly used white parchment is not kosher because it is not properly processed. Furthermore, in the Halacha book "Shulchan Aruch" the author made an error by defining the flesh side as the skin side and vice versa, which according to the Halacha invalidates it, as stated in Halachot of Torah-Scrolls, Tefillin and Mezuzah (1:8): "All who write on parchment on the hair side, or who wrote [...] on Duchsustus [skin side] instead of the flesh side – invalidates". The same applies to the Torah scrolls they possess. There are additional reasons beyond those listed to invalidate them, such as misunderstanding what is a "closed portion" versus an "open portion", missing letters, or substituting letters. I detailed all of these in the article. And anyone who distorts the religion of Moshe courageously is judged the same as heretics – lowering and not elevating.

3) They Interprets the Sage's Fables Literally

If you encountered a person on the street talking to an ant, and you approached him and wondered: "What are you doing?" and he answered: "I heard a parable about a grasshopper that was lazy in the winter, and the ant spoke and said: 'Who did not toil on the Eve of Shabbat' etc.", well, this is how those lacking understanding and intellect see it. The one known as "Our Old Master and Teacher" and as 'Baal HaTanya' wrote a Halacha book deriving Halachot from the parables of the Sages Z”L. Here is an example from his book 'Shulchan Aruch HaRav' (Halachot Shabbat 260:4): "One who burns [his] nails [after cutting them] is Chassid; [one who] buries them is Tzadik; [one who] throws them away is evil, as a pregnant woman might pass over them and miscarry. However, it is permissible to throw them away in a study hall [=Beth Midrash] and the like, where women are not commonly found to pass by".

And regarding the literal interpretation of the fables of our Sages Z”L, our Rabbi explains in 'The Guide for the Perplexed' (Introduction, p. 10):

And many words came into the parable, none of which add anything to the matter being illustrated; they were only said to embellish the parable and arrange things in it, or to further obscure the matter being illustrated". And our Rabbi adds in his Interpretation to Sanhedrin (10, 1):

"And what you need to know is that regarding the words of the Sages R.I.P.[in their Drashot] people are divided into three groups: The first group [...] understands them literally [...] and did so only because of their ignorance in wisdom and their distance from the sciences [...] and this group – pity for their stupidity [Perhaps the ignorant gullibles among them deserve pity, but not the leaders and heads of this sect who lead the people astray after the futility and inject heresy into the hearts of the people of Israel], for they exalt the Sages according to their own thinking, but they only degrade them to the utmost humiliation [...] and as the Lord lives, this group destroys the splendor of the Torah and darkens its radiance".

And after we deviated from the topic for an important purpose, let's return to our matter. Thus adds and says the smelly rebbe in his book (Halachot of Hand Washing 4, 4):

”Sages said: Anyone who sleeps at night for sixty breaths, [since] his soul departs from him – the spirit of impurity comes and rests upon his body. And as soon as he wakes from his sleep, the spirit of impurity departs from his entire body except for his hands, where the spirit of impurity does not depart until he pours water over his hands three times”.

They have an obsession with impurity (although we are all impure until we merit the purification by the ashes of the red heifer), and thus said the smelly in his book “Tanya” (1, 8): “An ignoramus who cannot learn, must cleanse his soul from this impurity of this peel by its being reincarnated in the Hollow of a Sling, as stated in the Zohar [...]. But for forbidden speech, such as clowning and slander and the like – which stem from the three completely impure peels – the Hollow of a Sling is not enough to pure and remove its impurity from the soul; rather, it must descend to hell”, oh my, oh my…

And one should ask, what are those “three impure peels”? Is there a basis for relying on these serious matters? Well, the source for those "three impure peels" is found in the Oral Torah in the tractate Uktzim (2, 4): "All shells are impure and cause impurity and counted. Rabbi Yehuda says there are three shells in an onion". That's all, they corrupt the Halachot of purity and impurity related to making onion broth in times Holy Temple exist to frighten the masses so that they will follow them.

And thus rules our Rabbi in Halachot of Kings and Wars (11, 3):

“All who adds or subtracts or impertinence regarding the Torah and removes Mitzvot from their plain meaning, he is definitely evil and Epicurean [=and according to the ethical definition, an Epicurean is one who decries the words of the Sages]".

And it is a method, and as I heard from a past friend who converted after them, according to him, all Chabad’s doctrine is based on the Oral Torah. Here is a further foolish interpretation on Halachot of Food Impurity (7, 1):

"The streaming liquid is not considered a connection, neither to impurity nor purity. How so? If one pours pure liquids into an impure vessel [...] – the streaming column remains pure".

And regarding this, Menachem Mendel says (Collected Talks, 37, 27):

"The laws of pouring, which contain guidance and learning through the way of hinting at the inner aspects of the matters. An explanation of the matter: 'Upper' [=the upper vessel from which it is poured downward] hints to the 'true upper' – the Holy One, blessed be He, for there is none higher than Him [and is it appropriate to compare the Holy One, blessed be He, the King of Kings to a vessel?], and 'lower' [the vessel into which it is poured] hints at creatures, particularly the physical material world, which is the lowest in degree that there is nothing lower beneath it".

His words are scribbled scrabble. It is further said in Halachot of the Chosen House (1, 8): "When building the temple and the courtyard they build with large stones, and if they do not find stones, they build with bricks". And the donkey "interpreted" (Book of Talks, 5752 1, 234): 'In the future when the sphere of the Kingdom will be above 'Zeir Anpin' [see: 'Father and Son – Christians hallucinations in the Zohar book'], and therefore built [in the past] with inanimate stones symbolizing the spheres of the Kingdom, and not with growing acacia trees symbolizing 'Zeir Anpin'; but not of iron [which is] below stones, symbolizing the sphere of the Kingdom in its descent to the world of creation, formation, action".

And on the idol-worship of the ‘Sephirot’ see Rabbi Naor Toito's article: "Rambam's Attitude Towards Kabbalah (Part 6)".

4) They constitute an obstacle for people of truth

People of truth are distressed by those disguised priests who deceitfully and falsely represent the Torah of Moshe in order to exploit, feign piety and rule. Today, when truth is absent and hidden, anyone who wishes to draw closer to his Creator will have to endure the deception, and if he desires words of truth and is steadfast in spirit he will have to navigate through an immense tangle of foolish Chumrot, separating the wheat from the chaff for years until he might merit reaching a little bit of the true path. Furthermore, if he is intelligent, he will shake off the nonsense he hears and think that the religion of Moshe is foolish and exploitative. Sometimes, the lack of mental powers will prevent a person from dealing with all of this, leading them to turn their back on the religion of Moshe and never to return.

Moreover, we know about Chabad that they frequently study Rambam, who compiled for us the Halachot from the complicated Gemara and the Mishnaic interpretations into one book where they are orderly and easy to understand. In other words, he presented the Oral Torah to the nation of Israel in a reliable and good manner. Therefore, it is important for Chabad to show that they are advocates of his teachings, but in reality, they deny many of his writings and abuse his work.

They have their own edition: 'The Complete Rambam [no less and no more!]' (see here).

When they market the books of Rambam, one might initially think they are spreading light and knowledge among the nation of Israel. However, I will now prove that this is actually a group rape and the corruption of our Rabbi's writings. Here's what's included in their edition (Ibid):

"The methods of other Rishonim regarding each Halacha, which of the Poskim disagree with Rambam and which agree with him; the way the Rishonim understand Talmudic discussions relevant to this Halacha [...]; the practical Halacha in the books of the Poskim (from 'Shulchan Aruch', 'Shulchan Aruch HaRav', 'Mishna Brurah', and the great Poskim after them); The discussions found in the Rishonim and the Acharonim on each Halacha, and the new interpretations of the Rebbe [as mentioned there as 'King's Adornments'] scattered throughout the books of his Torah".

It was very important for the infidel from Chabad to destroy the life work of our Rabbi the Rambam. Therefore, he published many books in which he digs and undermines Rambam's words (the book series 'Royal Wine', 'Rambam's Encores' and others), it was crucial for him to turn the Rambam into some hallucinating Ashkentaz. Our Rabbi wrote: "The number of chapters in this book [...] Halachot of the Chosen House: Eight chapters", and there Mendel pushes and mentions in small print: "Hinting at the eight-string harp in the redemption", and what harp is in his head!?

And if the jokers have had enough, see what the abominated Mendel claims (The Torah of Menachem 5721 1, 257):

"The Rambam knew the Torah of the Kabbalah, but because in his time there was a danger of revealing Kabbalistic concepts he concealed them in his writings so well that they couldn't recognized. But after that, our rabbis, our presidents, came and revealed the teachings of Kabbalah found in Maimonides compositions".

He further writes (Collected Talks 3, 768): "It is known that the Rambam was a Kabbalist and many matters in his books originate from the Zohar".

He is so zealous to prove that also our Rabbi is one of the mushroom eaters and tries to prove his claim (Farbrengen 1984 3, p. 1950):

"From here an answer, also to those who claim that the Torah of the Kabbalah did not reach the hands of the Rambam: because the Rambam mentions and emphasizes in the preface to his writing concerning 'all of those interpretations, Halachot, and responses written by the Geonim', and we found in the responses of the Geonim, such as Rabbi Hai Gaon and Rabbi Sherira Gaon and so forth – matters pertaining the Torah of the Kabbalah! And it is inconceivable to say – God forbid, heaven forfend – that the Rambam did not address or skipped those responses of the Geonim who dealt with Kabbalistic teachings!! – Surely, the Rambam also studied and engaged with the Torah of the Kabbalah".

What then is their claim? One claim is that our Rabbi concealed the wisdom of the new Kabbalah in his writings, meaning the words have a hidden subtext, and we have already shown a small portion of their delusions, and we've also shown that according to our Rabbi it involves impertinence regarding the Torah; yet, this is not evidence at all, and what is it like? It's like saying that Ahmad Tibi supports the completion of Israel because he said he loves olive oil, and the initials of Olive is Our Land Israel's Valuble Essence".

In his second claim, on which he based his grand declaration, abominated Mendelovitz mentioned that our Rabbi relied in his Halachot ruling on sources and interpretations, various Halachot and responsa composed by the Geonim, and that all this pseudepigraphy has already been refuted and exposed. See: "Rambam's Attitude Towards Kabbalah (Part 5)" and here is a bit of what is said in the article there, on the responsa of Hai Gaon which Mandy Shmandy relied upon:

"In recent generations, researchers of Kabbalah have discovered that after completing his work on composing the Zohar, Moses de Leon went on to arrange and edit the responsa of the Geonim known as 'Sha'arei Teshuva'. He added his own fake responses, and in many places altered the original text for various purposes, especially to implant his 'Kabbalistic' ideas”.

For the additional sources mentioned in the article above, please refer to the original Hebrew version. Nevertheless, we will include two selected excerpts from Danzig's article (pp. 21–48).

"The collection 'Sha'arei Teshuva'; this collection was also edited by Rabbi Moses de Leon, who inserted his forgeries [then why he calls him Rabbi?] […] from all this, I conclude that Moses de Leon edited not only the large printed collection 'Sha’arei Teshuva' but also the small collection in the New York manuscript [where the dog Mendel stayed], in order to integrate in different places within the collection the forged signs he had added, earlier, at the end of the printed edition, with the aim of attributing his forgeries to our 'Rabbi Hai [Gaon] […]

Here the extent revealed to our eyes, in which Moses de Leon added and changed the original text – not only by adding whole signs to the printed 'Sha'arei Teshuva' (a phenomenon that researchers have already pointed out), but also by integrating single lines, or small sections, within the responsa of the Geonim – in order to embed his Kabbalistic ideas within ancient sources".

Thus far from Naor Toito's article.

5) They replaced our Torah with pagan Kabbalah.

Mendel added, or more precisely renewed and added immeasurably to the true Torah, to the extent that he practically created a new Torah. For this purpose, he relied on interpreting the fables of the Sages Z”L literally along with corrupted editions; Mendel inserted in many places in his writings the phrase: "A new Torah will come out from me", and on the Chabadpedia website, it is interpreted as: "The source for this is from the verse in the prophet Isaiah (51, 4): 'For Torah shall go forth from me', and the Sages interpreted this as 'a new Torah will come out from me' [Source: Romm Printing – Vilna Edition]".

This constitutes infidelity regarding one of the foundational foundations of our Torah, which instructs the eternal of the Torah of Moshe: "The ninth foundation, the abrogation. That the Torah of Moshe will never be abrogated, and no other Torah will come from God besides it, nor will anything be added to it or subtracted from it, not in the writing nor in the interpretation, as it says: 'Do not add to it and do not subtract from it' [Deut. 13, 1]".

Regarding the corrupted editions, see: "The Heretical Prints of Mishneh Torah".

In addition to his own pagan additions and innovations, the true Kabbalah – The Oral Torah – was replaced among Chabad (and not only among them) with supernatural idolatrous Torah, which were mainly established on interpreting the fables of the Sages literally, and after the foundation of intellect was breached by adopting all impossibilities, further ancient idolatrous beliefs infiltrated, dating back to the time of our father Abraham. Thus our Rabbi says in "The Guide for the Perplexed" (3, 30):

"And the Lord – exalted – in His mercy, wanted to erase this error from our hearts, and to remove the weariness from our bodies by nullifying those exhausting deeds [=futile beliefs and pagan rituals] that yield no benefit and gave us the Torah through our Rabbi Moshe, who informed us [...] that their worship [is] the reason [for the curse:] for the withholding of rain and the destruction of the land which will not yield anything, and the fruit of the trees will wither, and there will be harm in all situations, diseases will occur in bodies, and life will be shortened [...] contrary to what the foreign-worshipers preached to people to make them worship them, because the foundation of the Torah is the abrogation of that perspective and the obliteration of its traces".

The "dollar from the Rabbi" is not a charm for any good, but a curse, because by this we cast away comprehension of God from within us, and so too for all the Etrogs he blessed, and the wine he touched; as well as the cloak of the Baba Baali – all of these invoke wrath before God – exalted: "Why have they angered Me with their statues, with foreign futilities?" (Jer. 8, 19).

Chabad has their own prayer book (see here) according to the version of the Ari, the Papaya rectification man (see: 'The Evolution of Tu B'Shevat Customs: From Annulment of Sages Ordinances to Idolatry'), who was one of the father of all impurity in inspiring: the writing of the Zohar; the literal understanding of the fables of the Sages Z”L; the infiltration of the belief in reincarnation into our nation (see: 'An Examination of the Belief in Reincarnation [Part I] [Part II]'); uprooting the Mitzvot from their plain meaning by inventing gates in imaginary upper worlds; corporealization of the Creator in associating spheres; and directing special intentions as if an antenna is needed.

"Lord, my strength, and my stronghold, my refuge in the day of distress, to You nations will come from the ends of the earth and say: Our fathers inherited nothing but lies, futility and useless things" (Jer. 16, 19).

6) They are sanctimonious.

They are convinced that the truth is with them, and anyone who disputes with them is labeled with the official title: "Mitnaged" (=opponent; see here). Not long ago, in front of several residents, I made hard-to-bear allegations against a foolish Chassid – "the Rebbe's emissary" in the city of Metula – and after I established my position, he asked me if I put on tefillin. I answered yes, and then he said "So I'm content", to which I replied, "If you are content, it means you are right and that is not correct". I also said, "Your sin is too heavy to carry, you incite to foreign-worship and desecrate the name of God," and then he giggled a frightened giggle and mistakenly thought it was far from him.

On the other hand, some have been punished in this world, as half a year ago the "Rebbe's emissary" in Boston was punished by a hot-headed gentile who repeatedly stabbed him. That foolish Chassid was filmed for an interview on "ynet" and said (here): "But when you see that the Holy One, blessed be He, is with you and you are on the right side […] the faith and confidence that God is watching over me – it gave me the strength to fight for long minutes".

That fool also told a story about one of the leaders who was severely tortured in Russia because he spread "Judaism" and rejoiced that he was not afraid and eventually survived. However, not long after that event, they were punished in Russia, and over a million Jews perished due to their heresy. After all, it is not for nothing that in countries where the Haredi and Chassidic streams were widespread – such as Poland and Lithuania – Jews were almost completely annihilated (about ninety percent), while in the countries of the assimilated – at much lower rates, only about twenty percent".

"The Creator – his activities are unblemished, all His ways are judgment; God of faith and no iniquity" (Deu. 32, 4).

It is clear that their leader Mendel Shmendel has dug them a deep and dangerous pit from which they will never be able to escape, for if in their opinion they are engaged in great and noble Mitzvot according to their imagination, such as putting on tefillin, hosting Jews in Tbilisi and San Francisco for Friday meals, lighting Hanukkiahs and sharing Sufganiyot – it will never occur to them that they are irritating, infuriating, haters, enemies and being hostile to the Creator of the World.

7) They incite the people of Israel to foreign-worship.

It is very common in their community to "write to the Rebbe" (see here) and even promise salvations! Beyond the heresy in turning Mendel into a mediator between them and God, and replacing the God of Israel entirely with a disgusting and drunk flesh and blood deity, there is also a Biblical prohibition against seeking knowledge from the dead, and thus says our Rabbi in the Book of Mitzvot (Do-not-do, 38):

"The warning we were warned against seeking knowledge from the dead. [...] that whoever does this and dresses like this the dead will come to him in his sleep and tell him what he asks about. And it says: 'There shall not be found among you […] a necromancer' [Deut. 18, 11]".

And our Rabbi added in Halachot of Foreign-Worship (11, 13): "To sum up: anyone who does an action so that the dead will come and inform him – receives lashes, as it is said: 'There shall not be found among you […] a necromancer' [Ibid]".

"Every man is brutish without knowledge; Every goldsmith is put to shame because of the statues, for his molten image is a deceit and no spirit in them. They are futility, a work of delusion, in the time of their punishment they will be perished. Not like these is the portion of Jacob; For He is former of everything and Israel is the tribe of His inheritance" (Jer. 10, 14–16).

Our Rabbi explains at the beginning of the Halachot of Foreign-Worship that in the days of Enosh (the son of Seth and grandson of Adam) humans made a big mistake, and Enosh himself was among the mistaken. Their error was that they said: since God created these stars to guide the world and placed them in the sky – He accorded them honor. Therefore, they shall be praised and glorified, and show respect to them. And this is exactly how the gullibles behave towards the heretics and the various salaried priests, pursuers of profit, rulership and lechery, thinking mistakenly that honoring them is the will of God, blessed be He…

Furthermore, in the days of Enosh people began to build temples for the stars and to offer up sacrifices, and to praise and glorify them with words in order to obtain God's will according to their bad mindset. And that was the essence of foreign-worship, says the Rambam, that is, not that its worshippers said there's no deity but this, or this Rabbi, and still, on their bad way says Jeremiah (10, 7–8): "Who would not fear You King of the nations because to Thee it is fitting, because among all the wise men of the nations, and in all their kingdoms there is none like Thee. And in one thing they go astray ignorantly and foolishly – futile ethics, wood he is", meaning, everyone knows that You alone are God, but their mistake and folly is that they imagine this futility to be your will.

And it is very severe that they do this to children and youths in our country. I mean, they mingle in the cities and befriend children and youths, inviting them to meals, and there, at their tables, they implant their abhorrent dish. The child or youth continues to visit primarily because he is bribed, but at some point, they pressure him to visit at the Yeshiva, where they incites and instigate the naive, sophisticatedly, with the help of their senior and more skilled rabbits. There, he enjoys meeting his own age where the budgets are larger, where multiple activities happen per week to which he is personally invited.

These activities are called "Farbrengen", they study the doctrine of Chabad along with alcoholic drinks – and here is an example of a conversation that encourages them to abandon their parents and join the defiled Kollel of heresy. Where – as noted – it is a very slippery slope, and without the merit of grace or very stubborn parents standing by him – it is likely that the naive one will marry someone from their community, thus sealing his life.

Over time, he will understand that "there is no fear of God in this place" (Gen. 20, 11), and here is an example of their abhorrent dish which revolves around the verse (Gen. 12, 1): "And the Lord said to Abram, Go forth from your land and from your birthplace and from your father’s house to the land that I will show you” (Collected Talks [translated from Yiddish] 1, 15–16):

"When the soul descends below, it is given the strength to be able to leave 'From your land' implies 'lunge' – the desires of the animalistic soul, and 'From your birthplace' – from the assumptions of natural intellect and its natural traits [in other words, they are encouraging young people to lunge towards discarding logic and reason], and 'From your father's house' – from matters that arose due to improper education and habits [meaning, they are urging the youth to turn their backs on their parents and families], so that a person will leave all these matters and go 'To the land that I will show you' – to the synagogue and to the study hall where the desires of the godly soul are found, and this will nullify the natural wills, the assumptions of natural intellect, and natural traits and habits [in other words, they are encouraging youth to abandon all their scientific and professional aspirations and all that their poor parents have worked hard for]".

8) Some of them do not work and do not serve in the army.

A friend once wondered on me, do Chabadniks not work? It seems that some of them do work, and some do not. However, according to our Torah, it is obligatory for every person to work for his livelihood, it is not optional as some think, that one can declare that he "serves God" and henceforth commanded to impose himself on the public and shove his hand into the public funds, and their greed knows no bounds. And so it is written in Chabad edition, Halachot of Gifts to the Poor (6, 17):

“Tithe for the poor – one shall not pay debts with it, and not […] redeem captives with it, and not […]; but send some for an act of loving-kindness, and need to inform that it is a tithe for the poor. And it is given to a community member (to the rabbi – as a gift) as a favor".

This is not the intention of the Halacha, because not every community member (the greatest in the city) is poor. The intention is that he is trustworthy to distribute the tithe to the poor since he is both wise and honest and also receives requests from the poor.

Moreover, their leader, who did not work for his livelihood, said (Collected Talks 16, 534):

"The famous ruling of the Rambam (Mishneh Torah, Halachot of Torah Study 3, 10) prohibits rabbis and students of sages from taking their livelihood from the public and elaborates on censuring those who earn living from the Torah – making it a spade with which to dig, making a use from the crown of Torah. And brought on that many proofs from the Gemara. But those who came after him amended his work and brought several proofs that it is permitted to derive a livelihood from the Torah [for those 'proofs' see: ‘Thus was Hillel accustomed to say: “Who makes use of the crown – passes” (part 1) (part 2)’; and also: 'Time to act for the LORD, those have violated Your Torah', and more]".

And he continues there: "The Old Master and Teacher rules that it is forbidden to start learning Torah with the intention of making it a vocation to earn a livelihood – found using the crown of the Torah for mundane purposes, but if he learned for heaven's sake and afterwards he has no source of income but through teaching or judging and instructing – it would be learning for its sake [For its sake or his own sake? and what does the Torah need him? hewer and heaven's name desecrator! Besides, if he started learning for heaven's sake how suddenly does he turn the Torah into a spade? His ending proves on his beginning!]. When he is tormented by hunger, he will not be able to engage in it properly [=So he should go to work like all the Sages of the Mishnah and Talmud], or if he is able to make a living from another occupation, and leaves his job in order to make a living from studying Torah – this would be permitted [=If he has an opportunity to work and make a decent and honest living, it is permissible for him to turn his back on work, choose desecration of heaven's name, and make a living from Torah? Didn't he say above that only if one has no occupation it is permissible to make a living from Torah, and only if he is starving it is permissible to eat from the Torah], and this is not making a spade to dig for his needs [He receives money for his needs, doesn’t he? He makes a living from the Torah for his needs, doesn't he?], since indeed he leaves his occupation from which he could earn a living [He encourages parasitism and dependency!] to engage in Torah so that he does not neglect Torah study, thus he learns for its sake and its needs [Not for its sake and its needs, and the Torah does not need him, but he needs it to hew salaries, exemption and benefits]".

And he continues there:

"And seemingly, the permission for this needs to be explained in two reasons: A) As mentioned above [the delusion and misleading mentioned above]. B) The distinction between at the outset and post facto is that at the outset it is certainly forbidden to study in order to make a living. However, post facto, if one studied with permission, for its sake, then he has no choice because he must have a livelihood, so he is not obligated to study a vocation now since he can immediately earn a living from the Torah he learned with permission [meaning, according to the ruling of 'Baal HaMania' – if someone decided that he started learning for its sake – he is allowed to eat from the Torah, and then even if he has the possibility to earn a living honorably, he is allowed to choose the path of eating from the Torah – and every kid will scream that he started learning Torah for its sake, and to each one it will be permitted to eat from the Torah!]. And as an example, just as it is forbidden to go out on a ship or in a convoy that will cause Shabbat desecration, but if he went out earlier with permission, then it is allowed to continue going with the ship and the convoy, because he went out with permission and then saving a life overrides the Shabbat [What is the connection between Halachot of leaving a domain and making the Torah into a spade?!]".

And all his words are ridiculous and were likely said after drinking alcohol. He adds further in his continuation:

"And behold [another proof] in the Gemara (Brachot 35, 2), the disagreement between Rabbi Yishmael and Rashby, where Rabbi Yishmael says that one should plow during plowing time and harvest during harvest time etc. and Rashby says: if so what will become of the Torah? One should engage in Torah and his work will be done by others, and the conclusion there was that many did as Rashby and were unsuccessful, meaning that this is only a path for outstanding people like Rashby and Rabbi Yishmael, as clarified in tractate Nedarim (3, 1) and the like".

And Shmendel distorted the Gemara as its conclusion there is that the way of Rabbi Yishmael is the correct way – to integrate between a life of deeds and a life of spirituality, while the way of abominated Rashby – abandoning a life of deeds is not a good path and many have failed in it. Furthermore, even in the words of Rashboogie there is no evidence that it is permissible to enjoy Torah matters, rather they are meant to teach that a person should be content with little until he almost does not require a livelihood. And this path is very difficult because only a few are able to rejoice in a life of poverty and distress.

And the crazy concludes:

"And according to this, there are three ways in the study of the Torah: A) To earn a livelihood from it, which is forbidden; B) Study it for its own sake, but afterward, if one will not have other means of livelihood [and according to his words, even if he does have means – work should be rejected] – earn livelihood from it, which is permissible; C) To make his Torah permanent and work is done by others in a miraculous way [and one should not rely on miracles, and this is merely deceiving the masses and theft], which is the path only for outstanding people [and no one – especially an entire sect of drinkers – should rely on miracles].

In short, anyone who claims he is “studying for its own sake” can quickly turn the Torah into a spade, and even if he has opportunities to earn a respectable and honest living, it is permissible and even a Mitzvah to turn his back on work and throw his needs onto the public fund. And there is no mention of this deceptive distinction among our Sages Z”L.

Moreover, damned Mendel claimed (Collected Talks 20, 52): "[If] there is no one in the country as great in wisdom as him, the public is obligated to support him honorably and even make him wealthy". And he looked out for his own pocket… For if he succeeds in deceiving that he is the great genius, the public is obligated to make him wealthy… And indeed the fools did so.

9) They hate the IDF and the Land of Israel.

Mendel the idler advocates the idea that his Torah study and that of his foolish Chassids protects the nation of Israel, and he therefore opposes conscription explicitly, as he wrote in "Holy Letters" (20, 318), and here is his response:

"He asks whether a Yeshiva student in the holy land – may it be built and established – is obligated to enlist there in the army. The doubt in his eyes is astonishing until he needs to ask from afar, and it is well known and publicized the clear ruling of the Rabbis of Israel, and of course – it is based on our Torah [see: 'Service in the IDF for Yeshiva students (Part I) (Part II) (Part III)'], that Yeshiva students should not be recruited and should not serve in the army. Their diligent and persistent study of our holy Torah protects and saves our holy land and its inhabitants".

Also wrote to a fresh recruit as follows (Holy Letters 26, 175):

"There are many Mitzvot with special enchantment, and a special enchantment of the Mitzvah of Tefillin is that it instills fear and exhaust the power of the enemies of Israel [...] and bestows a complete victory to the armies of Israel, as mentioned in the Drasha of our Sages Z”L on the verse: 'Poised is he like a lion to tear off arm and scalp' [Deu. 33, 20]".

And regarding this, our Rabbi the Rambam writes in Halachot of Tefillin, Mezuzah, and Torah Scrolls (5, 5):

"Not only do these fools nullify the Mitzvah, but furthermore, they make a great Mitzvah which is unite the name of the Holy One, love Him and work Him, as if it were an amulet for their personal enjoyment, as it came up their foolish hearts that this thing benefits these worlds futilities".

And whoever preaches evasion of the Israel Defense Forces must necessarily hate the Land of Israel, and their hatred is well-known, as we hear at their protests against soldiers: 'Nazis,' 'Hitler,' and they even throw stones and used diapers at IDF soldiers. Moreover, out of their intense hatred for the soldiers of the IDF they also forbid the troublemakers who have been expelled from the Yeshivas from enlisting in the IDF with severe prohibitions! And even in times of war and immediate existential danger to the nation of Israel!

It turns out, therefore, that their claim that their study of the Torah protects the Land of Israel is nothing but a facade and deception for their desire to maintain their political and economic power, indeed for every Haredi who enlists is freed from the hands of the heretics, and the great Mitzvah of guarding and protecting the land of Israel is likely to undermine the idolatrous authority of the great rabbits in his eyes, and sometimes even to open his eyes wide and cause him to understand that his rabbits are nothing but heretics and repugnant infidels".

10. They claim that their dead idol is alive, that he is the Messiah and that he is a prophet.

The Zobivitcher Rabbit used to claim "our Tzadik Messiah will come which is the principle of all principles", but see here that he hinted strongly that he himself is the Messiah, and his foolish Chassids follow him, declaring enthusiastically: "Long live our master, teacher, and rabbi, the King Messiah forever and ever", they explicitly say that he is alive, active, and supervising; and recently I removed a huge sign that said "Messiah is here" with a picture of his scared face.

Furthermore, in a book called "A Prophet Among You" which brought "chapters dealing with the 'miracles' of the Rebbe – an aspect with a mystical aura", as well as other delusion such as: "And on the messianic idea that became the central banner [of Chabad movement]. The author, aware of the strange repulsion from this topic, courageously deals with the entirety of subjects, insisting on relying on Jewish sources [exactly as Christians do] [...] without skipping also the Kabbalistic-Chassidic aspect of 'a dwelling place in the lower realms' [yet another pit they dug for themselves in their excessive sanctimoniousness] – until what emerges as the mission of the hour and the generation's task – 'to welcome the Messiah' – the Lubavitcher Rebbe, may he live a long and good life, Amen [he's dead you lunatic]".

And we wonder, to what extent have they been deluded to believe that this donkey is a man of God? I mean, it requires a comprehensive destruction of a person's intellect because if he will investigate and examine – the penny will drop that he is a donkey. I remember that same old converted friend, when I used his internet by permission, I saw he searched on Google: "How to be in nullification", and here is a bit about that concept from Chabadpedia (here):

"Nullification is a fundamental concept in worship and education, which means the absence of being and the absence of presence. In Chassidism, it is mentioned in many places that the prelude to receiving the Torah and the Mitzvot was the nullification of the people of Israel when they proclaimed: 'We will do and we will hear' when they nullified their minds and existence, committing to do whatever they would be commanded.

How they love to subtly embed very bad messages... And where is it said that the people of Israel 'nullified their minds'? On the contrary, the foundation of all foundations and the column of wisdom is to know God through contemplation on the created nature and to trace His actions through the study of natural sciences and subtle philosophical concepts that prove the existence of God which demonstrates His providence and the verity of His essence. Although, that movement claims it is a virtue to do the opposite – to form a sect devoted to stupidity, daring to allege that this is what our forefathers did when they 'took upon themselves' the closing off of their intellect, the divinity form.

More said on the "Young Chabad Association" website (here):

"The virtue of the Tzadik is that he is extremely nullified before the Holy One. The Tzadik feels no personal 'self'; he is completely nullified to the Holy One's will. [...] Jews are willing to obey the words of a Tzadik without doubt [And how did the relationship with God suddenly become a relationship with the Tzadik? From worship God to worship the Tzadik], because they believe he does not speak what he wants, but what the Torah wants, what God wants".

The goal of all this delusion is to empty the minds of their followers and instill in them that they must heed every stupid mumble of heresy that comes out from their filthy mouths, and blindly commit their orders. In this way, their leaders consolidate immense political and economic power around them, from which they derive personal benefits, and through it, they continue the heretical dynasty of Chabad, evils name will decay.

11) They are self-wise.

They are not worried at all about publicly spreading their folly, which is very grave thing according to the Torah of Moshe, and even regarding the wise among the nation, Sages Z”L commanded: "Wise men, be careful with your words" (Fathers 1, 11), much more so for heretics and deluded who have corrupted the religion and refuse to admit the truth, and interpreting the commandments of the Torah in renewed ways which our forefathers never imagined, and as much as comes to their minds. And there is no end to the words of these fools who distort the verses of the Torah and invent new commandments and demands.

As mentioned, they are so determined and eager to spread futility that many wonder: are they mentally ill? However, they are considered sane and appropriate to receive punishments and suffering, and it is forbidden to judge idol-worshipers on a scale of merit.

And see what their leader writes to buy himself a reputation as a Tzadik in the land (Book of Talks, 5748 B, 564):

"You can also share a Jew you meet on the street, and amid his business dealings you tell him that on this day, a specific Talmudic tractate will be finished and repeat the ending passage infront of him".

And imagine some foolish Chassid approaching a random person on the street and saying: "A hair-net that one began to make from its upper hem remains pure until its bottom section is finished. If one began from its bottom section – pure", and what does he want from his life?

And they are so deep in their sanctimonious pit until it seems they will never get out of it.

Epilogue

Our Rabbi rules in Halachot of Foreign-Worship (7, 1–2):

"It is a to-do Mitzvah to destroy foreign-worship and its accessories, and all that is made for it, as it is said: 'Destroy shall you destroy from all places' (Deut. 12, 2). And it is said: 'Rather, thus are you to do to them: shatter
their altars' (Deut. 7, 5). And in the land of Israel we are commanded to chase it until it is completely destroyed throughout our entire country. But aboard we are not commanded to chase it, but any place we conquer we will destroy all foreign-worship that is there, as it is said: 'You shall annihilate their names from that place' (Deut. 12, 3), in the land of Israel you are commanded to chase them, but not commanded to chase them aboard".

Our Rabbi also says in the Guide for the Perplexed (3, 29):

"The essence and axis around which our entire Torah revolves is wiping out those beliefs from thoughts, and those traces from existence. To erase them from thoughts, it is said: 'Lest your heart be enticed' (Deut. 11, 16), and 'Whose heart faces away today [from the Lord]' etc. (Ibid 29, 17). And to erase them from existence, it is said: 'Shatter their altars, break their temples, and cut off their Astarte' (Ibid 7, 5), and 'You shall annihilate their names from that place' (Deut. 12, 3). These two points are paired in several places, and they form the first objective encompassing the entire Torah, as Z”L have informed us in their transmitted interpretation of the verse: 'Anything that God has commanded you through the hand of Moshe' (Num. 15, 23), they said [Sages Z”L]: from this you learn that whoever acknowledges foreign-worship infidels the entire Torah, and whoever infidels foreign-worship acknowledges the entire Torah. Know this".

Our Rabbi further says (Ibid 1,54):

"Please observe the Torah's verses when commanded to destroy the seven nations and said: 'Do not leave-alive any soul' (Deut. 20, 16), and immediately adjacent to that and said: 'In order that they will not teach you to do as all their abominations which they commit for their gods and you will sin before the Lord your God' (Ibid, 18), said, don't think that this is cruelty or a wish for revenge, rather a required action dictated by the human thought, to remove all those who deviate from the ways of righteousness and to eliminate all barriers preventing the attainment of perfection, which is comprehension of God, exalted".

We will conclude with our Rabbi Saadia Gaon's interpretation on Proverbs (10, 23): "It is a joke for the fool to engage in lechery; and wisdom – for the insightful", and his words are:

"It is a joke for the fool to engage in lechery' – this refers to what we always see from fools [the self-wise], who commit transgressions and say they are just a joke and a game [...] until even working foreign-worship appears to them as a joke, as he said in the Parasha of the golden calf (Exo. 32, 6): 'They sacrificed burnt-offerings and brought peace-offerings, and the people sat down to eat and to drink, and rose up to disport themselves'; and 'wisdom – for the wise' – for a wise person sees the main purpose [the outcomes of the deed and its results] and put the transgressions at its place".